Yes. Exactly. Though, I believe there is a process failure involved in bringing
a document to last call on the subject of fraudulent research.

This particular document is intimately related to Karrenberg's discredited
research. Essentially, this document's purpose documents the practice that
Karrenberg (and ISC) have been advocating. Kessens is obviously aware of this
document, and is directly involved.

I think the proper action of the Area Director for the Operations Area would be
tell the WG Chair that this document cannot proceed because of the fraud issues.
Of course, we have now seen what Mr. Kessens actions have been.

--Dean

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Sam Hartman wrote:

> OK. So it is reasonable to interpret your message to the IESG as a
> request that the IESG address the technical and process problems you
> believe exist in the document as part of its last call handling of the
> document with the understanding that you are almost certain to appeal
> if the IESG approves the document in its current form?
>
>
>

--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000