My message certainly can't be interpreted that way after I have corrected your
misinterpretation.

--Dean

On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> I repeat that your message to Sam some days ago
> (Message ID <Pine.LNX.4.44.0606060947580.19015-100000@citation2.av8.net>)
> starting with the words "Yes. Exactly." can only be
> interpreted as accepting that we plan to consider your message
> as a Last Call comment and not as an appeal. So that is
> what the IESG will do. As Sam also says, technical comments
> have to be considered on their technical merits, regardless
> of the form in which they are made.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Brian E Carpenter
> IETF Chair
>
> Dean Anderson wrote:
> > It has been a week since this appeal was made, yet it does not appear on the
> > IESG appeals page. What is the delay?
> >
> > Is it the case that Brian Carpenter (named in the appeal) has acted unethically
> > to refuse consideration, as he threatened? If so, that is an IESG act that
> > should be recorded on the IESG Appeals site.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Dean Anderson
> > Av8 Internet, Inc
> >
>
>
>

--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000