Dean,

I am still at a loss how to proceed. Can you answer Sam's implied question:

>> Perhaps you are appealing the decision of the IESG to issue a last
>> call on the anycast bcp.

Is that the decision you wish to appeal?

Brian

Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>"Dean" == Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> writes:
>
>
> Dean> On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >> >>>>> "Dean" == Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> writes:
> >>
> >> Dean, here I'm speaking as an individual and I suspect some IESG
> >> members may agree with me and others may disagree.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> Dean> I misunderstood you. I thought that the "almost certain to
> Dean> appeal" meant an appeal should be accepted now.
> >>
> >> So, when there are two paths to resolving an issue--one confrontational and
> >> one reasonably cordial we try and choose the cordial path.
>
> Dean> This has nothing whatsoever to do with cordial vs confrontational. This has to
> Dean> do with following process. I have filed an Appeal.
>
> OK. If you want to be formal, it is my opinion that your appeal
> should be rejected because it does not clearly state which decision
> you are appealing.
>
> If you were to follow up to your appeal and ask for it to be
> considered as an appeal and clearly state what decision you are
> appealing then I agree we are obligated to consider it as an appeal.
>
> Perhaps you are appealing the decision of the IESG to issue a last
> call on the anycast bcp.
>
>
> I'm honestly not sure whether you would need to appeal such a decision
> to David or to the whole IESG. According to RFC 2026, it is the IESG
> who makes a decision to last call a document. However the IESG
> delegates that to individual IESG members.
>
> Perhaps Brian and or David can shed light on whether they would like
> such an appeal to start at David or to start at the ISEG [sic] chair.
>
>
>