[gro list dropped from cc]

>>>>> "Dean" == Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> writes:

Dean> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We missed the final I-D cut-off by about three hours, by my
>> calculations (doh!). However, in the interests of keeping those
>> interested in sync with progress, the document we intend to
>> submit as -04 is attached.
>>
>> Some recap of this document's history:
>>
>> + the document that completed grow wglc was -02.

Dean> The -02 draft did not complete WGLC. A new draft was
Dean> issued.

It's often the case that a WG will decide that the result of a WG LC
is that minor changes are required and that a new draft will be issued but that no new LC is required.

Another common reason for a post-wg-LC draft is comments received from
the AD between the time when the AD accepts the draft and an IETF last
call is issued.

--Sam