Dean:

>Let me put it another way: Housley has previously expressed through two
>recorded votes and possibly through discussion on the IESG email list,
>an intention that IETF IPR policy can be ignored, or as Bellovin stated,
>that RFC3979 isn't the policy of the IETF. That is relevant to the
>present issue of IPR Policy compliance in the 'housley' draft

Which ballot positions do you have in mind?

You should talk to Jeff Schiller, Steve Kent, and to folks at Entrust
about my record in this area. Check out my position on the
undisclosed Entrust patent on CRL Distribution Point certificate
extension processing.

Russ